High Quality but Morally Dubious

1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
beonewithyourinnerfangirl
ichigo-kuriimu

the japanese “-ne?” particle and the british slang term “innit” serve the same function

ichigo-kuriimu

Standard English: It’s cold, isn’t it?

Japanese: Samui desu ne?

British: It’s fuckin’ freezin’, innit?

ichigo-kuriimu

image

i have to do everything around here

notahorseindisguise

i hate this cause i did japanese for like a year and this explains the use of the -ne particle WAYYYY better than my teachers ever did. it took me ages to comprehend what this post makes abundantly clear.

my teachers: its like a, a little rise at the end of a sentence, to show that you are seeking a response, while not warranting the -ka particle which would make it a proper question.

me: ok. i guess i get that??

this post: its like saying “innit?” 

me: oh. oh no.

wind-on-the-panes

fun fact: afaik, "-ne" was inherited from the Portuguese settlers/priests that stayed in Japan in the 16th century. It comes from "né?", which the contraction of "não é?", "isn't it?".

It's LITERALLY "innit".

twofingerswhiskey

oh so like "eh" in canadian

the-last-teabender

*un-Babels your Tower*

silver-tongues-blog
hatingongodot

The Overwatch Diversity Index thing is so funny to me bc I feel like Alan Grant seeing dinosaurs roam for the first time, I'm like "How can you exist, you were supposed to die years ago..."

It feels like an artifact that was transported to the present from the mid 2010s when people did act like diversity was quantifiable. Like God of course you soulless weirdos would have this bizarre setup where you funnel points into Ethnicity like you're allocating points into DnD attributes or some shit, and God only knows how many people in 2016 would have seen that and been like "Wow this is a great tool to help you diversify your characters!"

(I mean I'm sure there are still people like that now but I like to imagine that for the most part people have grown tired of that kind of shit and largely demand higher quality rep)

hatingongodot

You know what it is, this is just those 4chan Privilege Quizzes only instead of mocking minorities it's saying "Actually this is GOOD, please don't ask us to tell you how we came up with the numbers for the Ethnicity Scale"

hatingongodot

Okay I'm sorry I have to know more about what kind of fuckin race science is being employed to quantify this shit. Why is "Arab" a 7? What is above and below that. What about Culture? How many options did you even list and what were the parameters for quantifying THAT? Do they go into negative values, say if you're rich? What the fuck is Cognitive Ability and once more, what phrenology ass pseudoscience was employed to quantify this. I must know

image
wizardshark

I went DEEP into this and found like the dev talking about it and God it's such a good idea IN CONCEPT if they just made markers that get numbers based on how many of an identity you've included in your game (like 2 CIS 2 HET 1 WHITE 3 MEN kind of thing) but instead they deciding to QUANTIFY IT INSTEAD

The result is the torbjorn is more OLD than Lucio is BLACK. And torbjorn is more DISABLED than zarya is RUSSIAN. And Zenyatta is equally attractive as mercy and Moira is more Cisgender than Lucio and it's like WHAT ARE YOU SAYING WHAT IS THIS

wizardshark

Oh also the head dev of the project is a white rich woman who loves Elon Musk and the NBA

hatingongodot

This explains a lot, but also I wish there was a way for you to have heard the noise I made when I read "Torbjorn is more old than Lucio is Black". This is so bad!!! This is so bad!!!!!!!

widowmaker

I need yall to also see Winston's cause it's making me lose my mind

image
silver-tongues-blog

winston had more race than ana?

prokopetz
galahadwilder

A sudden, terrifying thought

When you see an animal with its eyes set to the front, like wolves, or humans, that’s usually a predator animal.

image

If you see an animal with its eyes set farther back, though—to the side—that animal is prey.

image

Now look at this dragon.

image

See those eyes?

image

They’re to the SIDE.

image

This raises an interesting—and terrifying—question.

image

What in the name of Lovecraft led evolution to consider DRAGONS…

As PREY?

dorito-and-pinetree

I know this isn’t part of my blogs theme but like this is interesting

haiku-robot

i know this isn’t part
of my blogs theme but like this
is interesting



^Haiku^bot^8. I detect haikus with 5-7-5 format. Sometimes I make mistakes. | @image-transcribing-bot @portmanteau-bot | Contact | HAIKU BOT NO | Good bot! | Beep-boop!
angel-of-double-death

@howdidigetinvolved

perfectly-generic-blog

The eyes-in-the-front thing (usually) only applies to mammals. Crocodiles, arguably the inspiration for dragons, have eyes that look to the sides despite being a predator.

pyrrhiccomedy

hey what up I’m about to be That Asshole

This isn’t a mammalian thing. When people talk about ‘eyes on the front’ or ‘eyes on the side,’ they’re really talking about binocular vision vs monocular vision. Binocular vision is more advantageous for predators because it’s what gives you depth perception; i.e, the distance you need to leap, lunge, or swipe to take out the fast-moving thing in front of you. Any animal that can position its eyes in a way that it has overlapping fields of vision has binocular vision. That includes a lot of predatory reptiles, including komodo dragons, monitor lizards, and chameleons.

(The eyes-in-front = predator / eyes-on-sides = prey thing holds true far more regularly for birds than it does for mammals. Consider owls, hawks, and falcons vs parrots, sparrows, and doves.)

But it’s not like binocular vision is inherently “better” than monocular vision. It’s a trade-off: you get better at leap-strike-kill, but your field of vision is commensurately restricted, meaning you see less stuff. Sometimes, the evolutionary benefit of binocular vision just doesn’t outweigh the benefit of seeing the other guy coming. Very few forms of aquatic life have binocular vision unless they have eye stalks, predator or not, because if you live underwater, the threat could be coming from literally any direction, so you want as wide a field of view as you can get. If you see a predator working monocular vision, it’s a pretty safe assumption that there is something else out there dangerous enough that their survival is aided more by knowing where it is than reliably getting food inside their mouths.

For example, if you are a crocodile, there is a decent chance that a hippo will cruise up your shit and bite you in half. I’d say that makes monocular vision worthwhile.

Which brings us back to OP’s point. Why would dragon evolution favor field of view over depth perception?

A lot of the stories I’ve read painted the biggest threats to dragons (until knights with little shiny sticks came along) as other dragons. Dragons fight each other, dragons have wars. And like fish, a dragon would need to worry about another dragon coming in from any angle. That’s a major point in favor of monocular vision. Moreover, you don’t need depth perception in order to hunt if you can breathe fucking fire. A flamethrower is not a precision weapon. If you can torch everything in front of you, who cares if your prey is 5 feet away or 20? Burn it all and sift among the rubble for meat once everything stops moving.

Really, why would dragons have eyes on the front of their heads? Seems like they’ve got the right idea to me.

spookcataloger

Worthwhile cryptozoological discourse

roach-works

i want to point out also that crocodiles live in water, which has much more perceptible currents than air does. the crocodile snout is sensitive! some sources say it’s as sensitive as a human fingertip. so they can have a really broad field of vision to scan around, and to gather a maximum amount of data on stuff above the water, while their sensitive snout is still below the water, feeling for the turbulence patterns of other swimming creatures. they employ both together.

image

they don’t need binocular vision to judge how close their prey might be. they have that big enormous triangular snout in front of them to feel it.

tldr; dragons have plenty of good reasons to have monocular fields of vision, possibly including sensitive snoots.

prokopetz

It’s worth noting that apart from the Hobbit piece, most of the dragon illustrations above are either taken from or directly name-checking Dungeons & Dragons, and D&D dragons echolocate. (It’s why they have Blindsight, among other things.) If you need to precisely locate a moving object up close, echolocation is a pretty good way to go.

What a thirty-ton fire-breathing lizard’s echolocation pulse would sound like is left as an exercise for the reader.

gothic-cepho
ratzeflummi

i am getting somewhat suspicious of this count dracula. jonathan wrote that he is behaving kinda oddly, and that he is talking as if he'd been there for all of those historic battles centuries ago

what really tipped me off though is that he calls himself "a dracula", which, yes, could just be referring to a person belonging to house dracula, but dracula is also the romanian word for dragon, and according to some legends dragons can take the shape of a human at will

so currently i'm thinking that our friend jonathan harker might have been imprisoned by a dragon

ratzeflummi

we have not heard from our friend jonathan in three days, so now i am starting to worry that he has been eaten by the dragon

ratzeflummi

we have heard from johnny! he has not been eaten by the dragon yet!

however, dracula has been described as moving "just as a lizard moves", so this is further proof of my theory

gothamcitycentral
tvguts

I feel like if I rebooted Scooby Doo for the 127th time I would just say screw it and make one of them goth. Having trouble deciding which one, though. Here are my cases for each of them:

Velma: REALLY into classic literary horror and stans the Hex Girls like in her Mystery Inc. incarnation. Still dresses like a dork.
Shaggy: Listens to a lot of metal and wears cargo pants, thinks monsters and demons and stuff are sick as hell in theory but freaks out when actually in the presence of one.
Daphne: Stylish, girly vamp-goth and reader of Twilight-esque paranormal romance novels.
Fred: Actually, now that I’m typing this out, I don’t think it can be Fred. Fred is a big sunny golden retriever jock and therefore categorically incapable of being goth

tvguts

image

All of you are SO smart and SO correct